I urge bsh1 to study carefully the connect the dots metaphor in mister Schneier's blog posts to gain insight in how mass surveillance is inefficient. He knows that may prove a wish unfulfilled.
If I were motivated by money, I could have sold these documents to any number of countries and gotten very rich. Now we have before us a program that appears to do that very thing. He knows that the biggest and most secretive surveillance organisation in America, the NSA, along with the most powerful government on the planet, is looking for him.
In the three weeks since he arrived, he has been ensconced in a hotel room. Snowden said they achieved this by purposely getting the banker drunk and encouraging him to drive home in his car.
Redcoats rummaging about colonial homes were free to have a secret way of choosing the houses they were going to search. That access, along with the almost three years he spent around CIA officers, led him to begin seriously questioning the rightness of what he saw.
So no concession here.
He lay, propped up against pillows, watching CNN's Wolf Blitzer ask a discussion panel about government intrusion if they had any idea who the leaker was. Report this Argument Con I believe I have made a good case proving the inefficiency and great cost to society from the mass surveillance by intelligence agencies on US soil.
I could have people come after me. He seemed satisfied that the debate he longed to provoke was finally taking place. There are ways to conduct advanced searches and to narrow information down by criteria.
It is a plush hotel and, what with eating meals in his room too, he has run up big bills. According to the magazine the NSA stores data from around half a billion communications connections in Germany each month.
At the moment of checking in the guests must carry a valid passport or travelling ID in accordance to their nationality plus the immigration card according to the required Peruvian legal norms. He left the CIA in in order to take his first job working for a private contractor that assigned him to a functioning NSA facility, stationed on a military base in Japan.
TIA and other data-mining programs. Ever since last week's news stories began to appear in the Guardian, Snowden has vigilantly watched TV and read the internet to see the effects of his choices. And that is a concern I will live with for the rest of my life, however long that happens to be.
As for his future, he is vague. So is the gross limitation of civil liberties practiced on a grand scale, sometimes in ways that are not even apparent to the general public.
Or the Chinese government might whisk him away for questioning, viewing him as a useful source of information. Regarding intelligence gathering being vital for internet security.
When the NSA was conceived, it was designed to spy on foreign governments, not Americans. Rates include buffet breakfast. Secrecy does not imply a lack of checks.
A matter of principle As strong as those beliefs are, there still remains the question: Standard rate include accommodation, buffet breakfast and free WIFI.
Therefore, it is not inefficient. Reservations are not endorsable. There are legitimate security concerns, an issues Con never disputes, that necessitate secrecy.
Having a huge amount of resources blocked in data collection and data mining that does not bring comparative results is wrong. Not to mention a non specific feeling of mistrust that he would like voters to have of my principal source, mister Schneier, who is actually an expert in security matters and therefore has the ability to understand the issues at hand when dealing with IT systems, people involved in secret information handling and so on.
Con desperately need, and lacks, supporting sources in his case to verify his, and Schneier's assertions. Since the disclosures began to emerge, he has watched television and monitored the internet, hearing all the threats and vows of prosecution emanating from Washington.
The NSA's Mass and Indiscriminate Spying on Brazilians. By Glenn Greenwald, Guardian UK. 07 July 13 As it does in many non-adversarial countries, the surveillance agency is bulk collecting the communications of millions of citizens of Brazil.
That frightening scenario is exactly what we are now witnessing in the case of the warrantless NSA spying ordered by President Bush that was reported December 16, by the New York Times. Citizens concerned about surveillance do not have to answer the question, "what law restricts the NSA's spying?" paradigm" may well be connected to.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:michaelferrisjr.com fin. The consequences of these disclosures include strained foreign relationships, and the knowledge that mass surveillance programmes exists.
Discover the world's research 15+ million members. Mass surveillance makes us far less likely to communicate openly with our friends and loved ones, and it chills participation in the marketplace of ideas. In defending its surveillance practices, the government routinely invokes the specter of terrorism, but the truth is that the NSA is monitoring all of us.
The price of knowledge, a study concerning the NSA’s mass surveillance.
Introduction: In the United States of America surveillance has always existed. From home searches to wiretaps, surveillance has been conducted by the justice department either to provide evidence for ongoing investigati.The consequences of the nsas mass surveillance of citizens